|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
It was with disappointment that I read Bob Vaillancourt's article of May 8 ( "Pot leads to $100 fine" ) regarding the local high school student who was caught with $10 worth of marijuana at his school.
While I certainly agree with Justice Guy Mahaffy's contention that school is no place for drugs, I would further contend that a courtroom is no place for a teenager found to possess such a small amount of marijuana. I am troubled by this as a person who pays taxes - I cannot see how the expense of a prosecution is justified in this petty matter. Surely, the school has mechanisms in place to deal with such an infraction, a quick visit to any local high school's website should yield a code of conduct that states as much. I'm sure examples are made every day of those who fail to abide by this code of conduct - the schools suspend students regularly for such infractions. In fact, last year our provincial legislature passed Bill 212, which amended the Education Act. This includes a section that specifically prescribes no more than a 20-day suspension as punishment for possession of small amounts of illegal drugs. Are we to believe that since last June ( when the bill received Royal Assent ) circumstances have changed so much as to render this prescription inadequate? I am also troubled by this as a citizen, since some questions are raised for me. If our elected officials have so lately detailed a clear process for dealing with such a situation extralegally, why was the law involved at all? And even recognizing that the matter did come before the courts, how can we as a community justify imposing a criminal record ( with all the consequences for travel and employment it carries ) on such a young person for such a small offence? While I must again state clearly that I agree with Justice Mahaffy's contention - recreational/illegal drugs have no place in schools - I must strongly disagree with his decision regarding the necessity of setting such an example. Especially at such a price, both literally and figuratively. Jesse Greenwell Sudbury http://www.420magazine.com/forums/in...ste-money.html |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| Home • Members • Join • Customer Service • 2257 • Privacy Policy • Banners |
420 Girls® are a Division of 420 Magazine®
All content © and ® 1993-2012 420 MAGAZINE® unless otherwise noted. All Rights Reserved.