|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Contrary to Sam Allis's assertion about the new law that reduces penalties for small marijuana violations, the source of hilarity is not the way Question 2 was written, but the way some law-enforcement officials feign confusion over it ("Smoky subject," The Observer, Jan. 4).
The law, passed by 65 percent of Bay State voters, makes adult possession of an ounce or less of marijuana a civil, rather than criminal, violation punishable by a simple $100 fine. We trust law-enforcement officers to make life-or-death decisions every day about whether a given situation warrants discharging their weapon. But Allis, and apparently many law-enforcement officials, worry that Massachusetts cops lack the ability to judge whether a confiscated marijuana sample weighs about the same as a pack of cigarettes. Oh, please. Eleven states for decades have had laws similar to the one that went into effect Jan. 2 in Massachusetts. Police in those states have proved they're professional and competent enough to enforce those laws. Surely Massachusetts voters should be able to expect the same from those sworn to serve and protect them. http://www.420magazine.com/forums/in...w-enforce.html |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| Home • Members • Join • Customer Service • 2257 • Privacy Policy • Banners |
420 Girls® are a Division of 420 Magazine®
All content © and ® 1993-2012 420 MAGAZINE® unless otherwise noted. All Rights Reserved.