[News Hawk]

Churches and Temples are no longer safe in America,” says Reverend Craig X Rubin of Temple 420, who was arrested November 8, 2006, at his religious establishment by over one dozen heavily armed officers of the LAPD. “If they can do this to us, they can do it to any church that the government disagrees with.” The Reverend known for his reoccurring role on Showtime’s hit series “Weeds” said arresting officers did not treat Temple clergymen as required by California Penal Codes 1524 and 1525.

Reverend Rubin aka General PharmerThe investigation of Reverend Rubin began only days earlier. An undercover officer joined Temple 420 on November 3, 2006, and immediately purchased 3.5 grams of sacrament, “PurpleErkle.” This was the basis of the arrest warrant for defendant Rubin; the seizure of all sacrament and money from the church; and, the freezing of all financial assets before conviction. As a result, Temple 420 may be forced to close. “What if this was my church?” Rubin’s lawyer asked.

Ready for Battle
Reverend Rubin has taken to calling himself “General Pharmer” and is distributing images of himself wearing an army cap emblazoned with a cannabis leaf, while making clear his church is not about war, but peace. Still, he is gearing up for battle with those trying to shut him down.

Temple 420 has retained civil rights attorney La’Chelle Monique Woodert, who plans not only to defend the church, but to then help the Temple sue the city for violating Temple 420’s religious freedom rights when they beat the criminal charges.

Burning a Sacramental Herb
A key tenet of Temple 420 is that members receive communion by burning a sacramental herb, marijuana. However, the plant contains the hallucinogen, THC, regulated under the Controlled Substances Act by the Federal Government; the sect is currently being barred from engaging in the practice of its religion on the grounds that it violates the California Health & Safety code.

Temple 420 claims the Religious Freedom Restoration Act affirmed by the Supreme Court for protection. By law the Government is prohibited from substantially burdening a person’s exercise of religion, unless the Government demonstrates that application of the burden to the person represents the least restrictive means of advancing a ‘compelling interest.’ This was affirmed in the case of “Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficiente Uniao Do Vegetal” when the church’s Schedule I hallucinogenic sacrament was seized. But, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of the church’s sacrament being returned and them being allowed to continue their religious practices.




Newshawk: Spliff Twister - 420 Girls
Source: californianewswire.com
Pubdate: 12 December 2006
Author: Christopher Simmons
Copyright: 2006 Neotrope
Contact: http://californianewswire.com/
Website: http://californianewswire.com/